New York: (Web Desk) In a pivotal address at the United Nations in New York, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia unequivocally reiterated its firm and unwavering position of support for the Palestinian people and their legitimate national cause. This reaffirmation solidifies Riyadh’s consistent diplomatic posture regarding the protracted Middle East conflict.
Dr. Abdulaziz Al-Wasel, the Permanent Representative of Saudi Arabia to the United Nations, articulated the Kingdom’s strong and consistent stance during his remarks. His statement underscored the enduring commitment to international law and the principles necessary for achieving a sustainable resolution to the conflict.
Diplomatic Initiatives and the Two-State Solution
Dr. Al-Wasel highlighted Saudi Arabia’s active role in fostering diplomatic mechanisms aimed at achieving a just peace. Specifically, he noted the Kingdom’s co-chairmanship, alongside France, of a significant international conference dedicated to mobilizing support for the two-state solution. This diplomatic initiative is strategically designed to establish the prerequisite framework for achieving a lasting and equitable peace throughout the Middle East region. This collaborative effort demonstrates a pragmatic commitment to internationally sanctioned pathways for conflict resolution.
“The Kingdom’s co-chairmanship of the recent conference, in partnership with France, emphatically underscores our commitment to the two-state solution—a foundational principle that remains the sole viable pathway toward a comprehensive, just, and enduring peace in the Middle East,” asserted Dr. Al-Wasel. “This approach is rooted in respect for international legitimacy and the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people.”
Condemnation of Annexation and Settlement Expansion
A central component of the Permanent Representative’s address was a powerful and explicit condemnation of recent legislative actions undertaken by the Israeli government. Dr. Al-Wasel strongly criticized the approval of two draft laws by the Israeli Knesset, which seek to formally annex the occupied West Bank and to grant official legal status to illegal settlements within the territory.
He unequivocally characterized these domestic legal maneuvers as a profound violation of international law. This denunciation aligns with the global consensus that such unilateral actions undermine the prospect of peace and fundamentally alter the status of occupied land.
Furthermore, Dr. Al-Wasel stressed that Saudi Arabia categorically rejects all settlement and expansionist practices executed by the Israeli authorities. This rejection is based on the premise that such actions are inherently destabilizing and contrary to the spirit of peaceful negotiation.
Reiteration of Legitimate Rights and International Mandate
Concluding his robust statement, the Saudi representative reiterated the Kingdom’s steadfast and unqualified support for the Palestinian people’s legitimate right to self-determination. This support is explicitly focused on the establishment of an independent state fully conforming to the internationally recognized 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem designated as its capital.
Crucially, Dr. Al-Wasel linked this demand directly to the framework of international law, emphasizing that this outcome must be achieved “in accordance with relevant UN resolutions.” This adherence to the established international legal and political mandate provides the bedrock for Saudi Arabia’s position and frames the issue as one of legal compliance rather than mere political preference.
Conclusion
Dr. Abdulaziz Al-Wasel’s statement at the UN serves as a forceful diplomatic restatement of Saudi Arabia’s foundational commitment to the Palestinian cause. By actively co-chairing initiatives promoting the two-state solution and simultaneously issuing strong condemnations against Israeli legislative moves to annex territory and legalize settlements—actions deemed severe violations of international law—Riyadh projects itself as a key regional actor championing a resolution based on established international mandates. The Kingdom’s unequivocal support for an independent Palestinian state along the 1967 lines, with East Jerusalem as its capital, underscores the enduring consensus required for sustainable peace in the Middle East.
Would you like me to elaborate on the implications of UN Resolutions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or provide a brief definition of the “two-state solution”?
